PhilArchive
open access
A sixth kind of legitimate fieldwork in social anthropology: cross-disciplinary
I present the concept of cross-disciplinary legitimacy: the fieldwork which an anthropologist has done is considered legitimate fieldwork in another discipline as well. Also, I present a puzzle regarding how the anthropologist untrained in another discipline can do such fieldwork and a response.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Social Science and the Naturalization of Social Metaphysics: Old Biases and New Advances#716242
- On the meaning of “legitimate fieldwork” in social anthropology#75126
- Is an archaeological contribution to the theory of social science possible? Archaeological data and concepts in the dispute between Jean-Claude Gardin and Jean-Claude Passeron#761094
- Is social anthropology best defined by its fieldwork method? (An analytic philosophy paper?)#112054
- From the Ground Up: Philosophy and Archaeology, 2017 Dewey Lecture#778119
Record · ID 77170
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive