PhilArchive
open access
Aristotle and Linearity in Substance, Measure, and Motion
The model of a closed linear measure space, which can be used to model Aristotle’s treatment of motion (kinesis), can be analogically extended to the qualitative ‘spaces’ implied by his theory of contraries in Physics I and in Metaphysics Iota, and to the dimensionless ‘space’ of the unity of matter and form discussed in book Eta of the Metaphysics. By examining Aristotle’s remarks on contraries, the subject of change, continuity, and the unity of matter and form, Aristotle’s thoughts on motion, on contraries, and on the unity of substance can be brought together under a single interpretive framework, which can provide an approach to interpreting his ontology.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Order Between Substance and Accidents in Aquinas’s thought#736457
- Nāgārjuna’s Arguments on Motion Revisited#776906
- Aristotle on Geometrical Potentialities#102465
- Aristotle on Essence, Essential, Accident and Accidental#119287
- Du chien au philosophe : L'analogie du chien chez Diogène et Platon#740727
Record · ID 772025
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive