PhilArchive
open access
ADHD, Truth, and the Limits of Scientific Method
This paper makes an important contribution to the ongoing debate over the validity of the psychological construct, ADHD. While not ruling out the possibility that something of value may lie at the core of this diagnosis, the authors articulate a clear set of problems with the research logic that forms the foundation of the disorder itself, reaching the conclusion that there appears to be insuffi cient, valid scientifi c evidence for the demarcation of a coherent and independent disease entity.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Another look at ADHD#763123
- Plasma BDNF levels in children with ADHD before and after methylphenidate treatment.#152149
- PARRELATIONERS PÅVERKAN PÅ UTFÖRANDE AV DAGLIGA AKTIVITETER HOS VUXNA MED ADHD#273776
- Oligoantigenic Diet and Core Symptomatology of Children With Attention-Deficit /Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).#835297
- Study of Atomoxetine and OROS Methylphenidate to Treat Children and Adolescents Ages 6-17 With ADHD#829524
Record · ID 772128
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive