PhilArchive
open access
Maddy On The Multiverse
Penelope Maddy has recently addressed the set-theoretic multiverse, and expressed reservations on its status and merits ([Maddy, 2017]). The purpose of the paper is to examine her concerns, by using the interpretative framework of set-theoretic naturalism. I first distinguish three main forms of 'multiversism', and then I proceed to analyse Maddy's concerns. Among other things, I take into account salient aspects of multiverse-related mathematics , in particular, research programmes in set theory for which the use of the multiverse seems to be crucial, and show how one may provide responses to Maddy's concerns based on a careful analysis of 'multiverse practice'.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Naturally Fine Tuned For Life - A Defence of Metaphysical Naturalism#91620
- Why Park’s Argument from Double Spaces is Not a Problem for Relative Realism#714381
- A Theistic, Universe-Based, Theodicy of Human Suffering and Immoral Behavior#736038
- The Martingale Multiverse - How The Multiverse Accounts For This Fine Tuned Universe#72485
- Framework for Assessing the Maturity of Scientific Ideas Scientific Readiness Scale – ( S.R.S )#74051
Record · ID 772640
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive