PhilArchive
open access
The Practical and Philosophical Significance of Kant's Universality Formulations of the Categorical Imperative
This article begins with the claim that the Formula of Universal Law, interpreted as a test of the deontic status of actions, can't be made to work. If not, then one might wonder whether what other work it might do in the overall economy of Kant's ethics. I defend what I call the "formal constraint" interpretation of FUL, explaining how it can figure in a defense of the Formula of Humanity, and its psychological significance in moral thinking
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Decision Procedures, Moral Criteria, and the Problem of Relevant Descriptions in Kant's Ethics#773075
- Duties to Self, Consent, and Respect in Kant’s Moral Philosophy#708535
- Kant's Formula of Universal Law as a Test of Causality#732276
- Theorem: Morality as a rationally deducible law#108891
- Necessity, universality and the a priori in ethics#89212
Record · ID 773114
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive