PhilArchive
open access
Hybrid Accounts of Ethical Thought and Talk
This is a draft of a chapter for the Routledge Handbook of Metaethics, edited by David Plunkett and Tristram McPherson. I offer an overview of hybrid views in metaethics, with main focus on hybrid cognitivist views such as those defended by Daniel Boisvert and David Copp, and on hybrid expressivist views such as those defended by Michael Ridge and myself.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Nature and Explanatory Ambitions of Metaethics#752488
- Driving the Chariot North: How Experimental Metaethics Has Gone South with Error Theory and Non-Cognitivism#687558
- How Different Kinds of Disagreement Impact Folk Metaethical Judgments#700309
- Shafer-Landau, Russ, ed. Oxford Studies in Metaethics. Vol. 5. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Pp. 324. $99.00 ; $40.00#752483
- Appropriation, Dialogue, and Dispute: Towards a Theory of Philosophical Engagement with the Past#77335
Record · ID 773302
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive