PhilArchive
open access
Excuse validation: a study in rule-breaking
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Practical (un)cancellability#78395
- How Do Brazilian IT Companies Address Ambiguity Resolution in Legal Requirements Specification? - A study focused on data protection laws#1176993
- Capturing naive validity in the Cut-free approach#698056
- From Program Slices to Causal Clarity: Evaluating Faithful, Actionable LLM-Generated Failure Explanations via Context Partitioning and LLM-as-a-Judge#120576
- Factors influencing companies for reducing ambiguity in legal requirements specification and achieving their compliance with data protection laws#1176991
Record · ID 774003
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive