PhilArchive
open access
From Being to Constraint: Metamonism and the Transition from Hermeneutic Ontology to Generative Prohibition
Twentieth-century philosophy successfully established process and becoming as fundamental traits of reality. However, this achievement remained descriptive: becoming was recognized, but never derived. This paper introduces Metamonism as a methodological shift from axiom-based ontology toward ontological prohibition (generative constraint). Instead of asserting being or interpreting its meaning, Metamonism eliminates absolute identity as a logically impossible state. Becoming emerges not as a postulate but as a necessary consequence. This marks a transition from hermeneutic ontology to architectural reasoning over ad- missible states.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Ontology of the False State: On the Relation Between Critical Theory, Social Philosophy, and Social Ontology#772689
- Ontology#106022
- Towards an Ontology of Problems#779109
- A Plea for Descriptive Social Ontology#718191
- Individualism and Holism in Social Ontology#726545
Record · ID 77445
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive