PhilArchive
open access
Geometrical objects and figures in practical, pure, and applied geometry
The purpose of this work is to address what notion of geometrical object and geometrical figure we have in different kinds of geometry: practical, pure, and applied. Also, we address the relation between geometrical objects and figures when this is possible, which is the case of pure and applied geometry. In practical geometry it turns out that there is no conception of geometrical object.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- On the relationship between geometric objects and figures in Euclidean geometry#774593
- A hub-and-spoke model of geometric concepts#73489
- Commentary on the first book of _"Elements"_ — Definitions#715241
- The Epistemology of Geometry I: the Problem of Exactness#756767
- Pre-service primary teachers' cognition of MTK for Euclidean geometric patterns and its effects in classroom practice#1024419
Record · ID 774546
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive