PhilArchive
open access
Review of Kristin Andrews' _Do Apes Read Minds? Toward a New Folk Psychology_
Kristin Andrews proposes a new framework for thinking about folk psychology, which she calls Pluralistic Folk Psychology. Her approach emphasizes kinds of psychological prediction and explanation that don't rest on propositional attitude attribution. Here I review some elements of her theory and find that, although the approach is very promising, there's still work to be done before we can conclude that the manners of prediction and explanation she identifies don't involve implicit propositional attitude attribution.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A naturalistic argument against libertarian free will scepticism#114870
- HOTT and Heavy: Higher-Order Thought Theory and the Theory-Heavy Approach to Animal Consciousness#100844
- Jakob Hohwy: The predictive mind: Oxford University Press, 2013, 286 pp, Hardcover, £65#749353
- A non-dual interpretation of Newcomb's paradox: Integrating free will and perfect prediction#72705
- Christine Korsgaard, _Fellow Creatures: Our Obligations to the Other Animals_#97944
Record · ID 774843
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive