PhilArchive
open access
The Epistemic Duties of Philosophers: An Addendum
We were slightly concerned, upon having read Eric Winsberg, Jason Brennan and Chris Surprenant’s reply to our paper “Were Lockdowns Justified? A Return to the Facts and Evidence”, that they may have fundamentally misunderstood the nature of our argument, so we issue the following clarification, along with a comment on our motivations for writing such a piece, for the interested reader.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Epistemic Dispositions: Reply to Turri and Bronner#703057
- Epistemic Justice, Ignorance, and Procedural Objectivity—Editor's Introduction#778115
- Critical Notice of Epistemic Consequentialism (eds. Ahlstrom-Vij and Dunn)#771874
- Recovering Responsibility#117879
- Epistemic Value, Duty, and Virtue#117866
Record · ID 774876
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive