PhilArchive
open access
The Importance of Pluralism for Psychiatry
Though pluralism is given a lot of lip service it is not the status quo in psychiatry. In this paper I argue that following the recent Research Domain Criteria project of the National Institute of Mental Health, we run the danger of promoting a reductionist agenda that current evidence and research suggests is not the right way of tackling mental disorders. I further argue that in order to better address the needs of the patients and maintain the ethical standards required in the psychiatric profession we ought to maintain a pluralistic attitude in psychiatric research as well as practice.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Digital psychiatry: ethical risks and opportunities for public health and well-being#703840
- <b>Where psychiatry meets the law: Duties on legal practitioners and psychiatrists when adducing psychiatric evidence in criminal proceedings</b>#347335
- Defining the Legal Boundaries of Psychiatric Confidentiality: A Case Report.#371301
- The Matching Problem for Evolutionary Psychiatry#94294
- Transgender men and mental healthcare services in South Africa#292653
Record · ID 775725
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive