PhilArchive
open access
Prioriteit voor patienten met een lagere levenskwaliteit
This paper critically analyses the priority-setting rules used by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the UK and proposed by the Netherlands' Council on Public Health and Health Care (RVZ). It argues that neither gives proper weight to improving the lot of those who are worse off than others.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Leading healthcare improvement: an implementation strategy.#1080753
- Prioritizing health care: is “health” always an appropriate maximand?#254674
- Comparative Study on Objective-Setting Public Health Policy#68873
- Local Priorities, Universal Priorities, and Enabling Harm#698179
- 3.2. Policy question: Does the health sector have the right Information and Communication Technologies available?#1945
Record · ID 775995
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive