PhilArchive
open access
The Vienna Circle’s responses to Lebensphilosophie
The history of early analytic philosophy, and especially the work of the logical empiricists, has often been seen as involving antagonisms with rival schools. Though recent scholarship has interrogated the Vienna Circle’s relations with e.g. phenomenology and Neo-Kantianism, important works by some of its leading members are involved in responding to the rising tide of Lebensphilosophie. This paper will explore Carnap’s configuration of the relation between Lebensphilosophie and the overcoming of metaphysics, Schlick’s responses to Schopenhauer and Nietzsche, and Neurath’s reaction against Spengler.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Schopenhauer's Understanding of Schelling#776773
- Moritz Schlicks Vorlesungen über Nietzsche und Schopenhauer#755077
- Robert Zimmermann and Herbartianism in Vienna. The critical reception from Brentano and his followers#734021
- Nietzsche's 'the Birth of tragedy' as Anti-Pessimistic#88607
- Where have all the Monads Gone? Substance and Transcedental Freedom in Schleiermacher#751511
Record · ID 776054
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive