PhilArchive
open access
Can One Both Contribute to and Benefit from Herd Immunity?
In a recent article, Ethan Bradley and Mark Navin (2021) argue that vaccine refusal is not akin to free riding. Here, I defend one connection between vaccine refusal and free riding and suggest that, when viewed in conjunction with their other arguments, this might constitute a reason to mandate Covid-19 vaccination.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Refusing the COVID-19 vaccine: What’s wrong with that?#77180
- COVID-19 vaccine refusal as unfair free-riding#90091
- DOES COVID-19 VACCINE INFORMATION HAVE SPILLOVER EFFECTS ON ACCEPTANCE OF ESTABLISHED AND NOVEL VACCINES? EVIDENCE FROM TWO LONGITUDINAL AND TWO EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES#929241
- Liberty, Fairness and the ‘Contribution Model’ for Non-medical Vaccine Exemption Policies: A Reply to Navin and Largent#736625
- Incentives can spur COVID-19 vaccination uptake#17057
Record · ID 776983
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive