PhilArchive
open access
Cartesian and Neo-Cartesian Arguments for Dualism
I propose some arguments suggested by Descartes' text for the conclusion that we are not identical to our bodies. I suggest that a natural extension of those arguments leads to Plantinga's Replacement Argument. I conclude that even if such an argument is plausible, its conclusion does not establish the further claim that we can exist without a body.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Argument for Subject‐Body Dualism from Transtemporal Identity#749648
- An Historical Perspective on Duality and Category Theory: Hom is where the Heart is#111226
- Consideration of Self and Body in the Causality Game#248533
- Sadraddin Shirazi’s Corporeal Originated and Spiritual Subsisted Soul Concept as an Answer to the Mind-Body Problem#724632
- Uniqueness, Self belonging and Intercourse in Nature#745118
Record · ID 777107
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive