PhilArchive
open access
There’s nothing to beat a backward clock: A rejoinder to Adams, Barker and Clarke
Neil Sinhababu and I presented Backward Clock, an original counterexample to Robert Nozick’s truth-tracking analysis of propositional knowledge. Fred Adams, John Barker and Murray Clarke argue that Backward Clock is no such counterexample. Their argument fails to nullify Backward Clock which also shows that other tracking analyses, such as Dretske’s and one that Adams et al. may well have in mind, are inadequate.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Methods Matter: Beating the Backward Clock#711219
- Epistemic perceptualism, skill and the regress problem#708046
- Collective Counterfactual Planning: Coordination, Consent, and Verification under Representational Constraints#463257
- Epistemic advantage on the margin: A network standpoint Epistemology#723053
- Rethinking education through multi-level analysis of the impacts of epistemological assumptions on curricula#1078965
Record · ID 777485
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive