PhilArchive
open access
Failures of Categoricity and Compositionality for Intuitionistic Disjunction
I show that the model-theoretic meaning that can be read off the natural deduction rules for disjunction fails to have certain desirable properties. I use this result to argue against a modest form of inferentialism which uses natural deduction rules to fix model-theoretic truth-conditions for logical connectives.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Knot and Tonk: Nasty Connectives on Many-Valued Truth-Tables for Classical Sentential Logic#79958
- Radical interpretation and decision theory#739232
- The logical structure of linguistic theory#341422
- Disquotationalism and the Compositional Principles#739405
- Chapter 5: Intensional Transitive Verbs and their 'Objects'#754505
Record · ID 777866
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive