PhilArchive
open access
A study of attempts at precognition, particularly in dreams, using some of the methods of experimental philosophy.
Actual situations where folk philosophy might have predicted precognition effects were studied and dealt with experimentally and theoretically. Extremely strong experimental results were obtained but the findings supported not precognition but the Many Bubble Interpretation, which uses at this time dynamical systems theory as applied to the physics of the brain. Further experiments and theoretical work were discussed.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Dreams: an empirical way to settle the discussion between cognitive and non-cognitive theories of consciousness#766613
- Daytime experiences shape neural activity and dream content#205999
- A Dynamic Self-Model to Reconcile Higher-Order and Reflexive Theories: Bridging the Ontological-Phenomenological Gap#79785
- The Neuroscience of Spontaneous Thought: An Evolving, Interdisciplinary Field#742746
- Illusory Self Framework: Accessing Subtler States of Consciousness in Waking, Dreaming, and Deep Sleep#81957
Record · ID 778320
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive