PhilArchive
open access
What Should We Agree on about the Repugnant Conclusion?
The Repugnant Conclusion served an important purpose in catalyzing and inspiring the pioneering stage of population ethics research. We believe, however, that the Repugnant Conclusion now receives too much focus. Avoiding the Repugnant Conclusion should no longer be the central goal driving population ethics research, despite its importance to the fundamental accomplishments of the existing literature.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- In Defense of Speciesism-1979#776838
- The Ethics of Genetic Enhancement: Key Concepts and Future Prospects#89781
- Questioning South Africa’s ‘Genetic Link’ Requirement for Surrogacy#753285
- Creating Future People: The Science and Ethics of Genetic Enhancement#709346
- Debunking Morality: Lessons from the EAAN Literature#754749
Record · ID 778972
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive