arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Cross-Session Decomposition Attacks: Scaling Risk and Intent-Aligned Retrieval Defense
Scaling laws are usually read as a capability story: lower language-modeling loss yields more useful models. We study a safety consequence of this mechanism in \emph{cross-session decomposition attacks}, where benign-looking subqueries are asked across independent interactions and later recomposed t
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Cross-Session Decomposition Attacks: Scaling Risk and Intent-Aligned Retrieval Defense#781223
- ASCII Attack: Recontextualising Harmful Requests as Artistic Critique in Large Language Models#822607
- Quantization as a Malicious Task: Removing Quantization-Conditioned Backdoors via Task Arithmetic#290521
- Compositional security definitions for higher-order where declassification#120410
- Harmfulness Propagation Dynamics: Layer-wise Trajectories of Adversarial Intent in Large Language Models#1071316
Record · ID 779848
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive