arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
The Illusion of $\textit{What If}$: Evaluating the Breakdown of Counterfactual Reasoning in LLMs
Counterfactual reasoning requires models to reason beyond the observed world and explain how altered conditions propagate through downstream consequences. Existing benchmarks largely target bounded settings with fixed variables or single gold outcomes, overlooking open-domain scenarios requiring cau
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- CausalBN-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Causal Learning Capability of LLMs#974148
- The Illusion of $\textit{What If}$: Evaluating the Breakdown of Counterfactual Reasoning in LLMs#781229
- Efficient computation of counterfactual explanations of LVQ models#779198
- Counterfactual explanations as interventions in latent space#478134
- Detecting Inconsistencies in Model Specifications with LLM-as-Verifier Reasoning#1169612
Record · ID 779854
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive