Europe PMC
open access
Reject common measures like d' and Corrected Recognition, embrace d<sub>a</sub>: Simulation explorations of single- and multi-point recognition measures of sensitivity
In this article, we address the high prevalence of false discoveries in recognition memory research. Using Monte Carlo simulations, our goal was to find a valid measure of performance that reliably separates the contribution of sensitivity (accuracy) from that of bias. Relevant to myriad tasks, most
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Reject common measures like d' and Corrected Recognition, embrace d(a): Simulation explorations of single- and multi-point recognition measures of sensitivity.#659496
- The Problem of Common False-Alarm Rates and the Informational Asymmetry When Comparing Pure and Mixed Lists in Recognition Memory: Reconsidering the List-Strength Effect#178309
- Reading Recognition in the Wild#183251
- The Price of Prediction: Robust False Memories in Naturalistic Contexts#423372
- Recognition Memory Exclusion Task Performance but not Preretrieval Target-Selectivity Depends on Schematic Overlap Between Memory Cues and Retrieval Goals#16187
Record · ID 780651
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive