Accurate prediction is not profitable advice: profit-based evaluation of machine learning nitrogen recommendations in winter wheat

[2608.27205] Accurate prediction is not profitable advice: profit-based evaluation of machine learning nitrogen recommendations in winter wheat Skip to main content Search Submit Donate Log in Computer Science > Machine Learning arXiv:2608.27205 (cs) [Submitted on 27 Aug 2026 ( v1 ), last revised 28 Aug 2026 (this version, v2)] Title: Accurate prediction is not profitable advice: profit-based evaluation of machine learning nitrogen recommendations in winter wheat Authors: Xulong Wang , Po Yang View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract: Nitrogen rates for winter wheat are set before the season, under unknown prices and weather. The standard UK advice does not respond to prices, yet recent price swings moved the most profitable rate by tens of kilograms per hectare. Machine learning is often proposed as the fix. However, it is usually judged on prediction accuracy, and accurate prediction does not by itself make the recommended rate more profitable. Our insight is to score nitrogen advice directly by the profit it forgoes on measured yield response curves. We build a test bench on 892 such curves from two long running UK experiments, and sweep the nitrogen to grain price ratio to cover all price scenarios. On this bench, machine learning fails as a predictor. No model recovers the best rate within farm tolerance, and the benchmark noise shows none can. At normal prices, every model also loses to the standard advice on profit. The gain sits elsewhere. A simple correction step applied after the model cuts profit losses by a quarter, while better models and extra features give no gain. The same frozen correction cuts losses by 43% at the second site without any retraining. A hybrid of standard advice plus a damped correction removes bias and trims rare large losses. The same price sweep also prices emission cuts, at a cost comparable to current carbon prices. Machine learning therefore pays as a profit scored correction to standard advice, not as its replacement. Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG) Cite as: arXiv:2608.27205 [cs.LG] (or arXiv:2608.27205v2 [cs.LG] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.27205 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Xulong Wang [ view email ] [v1] Thu, 27 Aug 2026 14:52:02 UTC (872 KB) [v2] Fri, 28 Aug 2026 11:21:22 UTC (872 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Additional Features Audio Summary Current browse context: cs.LG < prev | next > new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations SciX Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? ) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? ) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? ) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? ) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? ) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? ) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? ) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? ) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? ) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? ) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate ( What is Replicate? ) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? ) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? ) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? ) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? ) IArxiv recommender toggle IArxiv Recommender ( What is IArxiv? ) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs . Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? ) We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders , member institutions , and all contributors. About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab)

Related documents

• Accurate prediction is not profitable advice: profit-based evaluation of machine learning nitrogen recommendations in winter wheat#779399
• Can we create a `race to the top' for weather forecasts to inform smallholder farmer decisions?#1155717
• Monitoring wheat leaf rust severity using machine learning techniques#419900
• FETS Benchmark: Foundation Models Outperform Dataset-specific Machine Learning in Energy Time Series Forecasting#134595
• Food Price Monitoring and Analysis (FPMA) Bulletin #7, 14 September 2026#818451