Revisiting Continuous Noise Sampling for Multi-Party Differential Privacy

[2608.27766] Revisiting Continuous Noise Sampling for Multi-Party Differential Privacy Skip to main content Search Submit Donate Log in Computer Science > Cryptography and Security arXiv:2608.27766 (cs) [Submitted on 27 Aug 2026] Title: Revisiting Continuous Noise Sampling for Multi-Party Differential Privacy Authors: Yucheng Fu , Tianhao Wang View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract: Combining secure multi-party computation (MPC) with differential privacy (DP) enables multiple parties to release aggregate statistics without a trusted curator, and the core primitive is the protocol to sample noise from a continuous distribution under finite-precision arithmetic. In this paper, we revisit the continuous noise sampling protocols and present several improvements in both security and efficiency. We start by identifying a vulnerability in widely used sample-and-scale constructions. We demonstrate that the scaling operation in arithmetic circuits confines the noise to a sparse, publicly known set of values, so that an adversary can observe the released noisy queries and decide which dataset produced them. As concrete demonstrations, we instantiate attacks on two systems employing such ``flawed'' sampling protocols: Orchard (OSDI'20) for DP secure aggregation and DP-BREM$^+$ (USENIX Sec'25) for DP federated learning. We report a near-$100\%$ attack success rate on both systems, under any noise scaler $s\geq 2$ used in practice. The leakage we reveal is intrinsic to the scaling operation, and direct repairs either substantially sacrifice utility or add significant precision bits to make the sampling more expensive. To address the security and efficiency issues together, we turn to discrete sampling at the granularity of individual biased bits. We make several optimizations to the sampler and prove its security. Our implementation achieves $4\times \sim 612\times$ speedup over existing secure discrete samplers and orders-of-magnitude speedup over the insecure sample-and-scale paradigm, with negligible utility loss compared to the ideal continuous mechanism. Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR) Cite as: arXiv:2608.27766 [cs.CR] (or arXiv:2608.27766v1 [cs.CR] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.27766 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Yucheng Fu [ view email ] [v1] Thu, 27 Aug 2026 22:57:31 UTC (166 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Additional Features Audio Summary Current browse context: cs.CR < prev | next > new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations SciX Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? ) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? ) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? ) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? ) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? ) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? ) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? ) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? ) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? ) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? ) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate ( What is Replicate? ) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? ) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? ) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? ) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? ) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs . Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? ) We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders , member institutions , and all contributors. About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab) Major funding support from (opens in new tab) (opens in new tab) (opens in new tab)

Related documents

• Revisiting Continuous Noise Sampling for Multi-Party Differential Privacy#779684
• Differentially Private Sampling from Distributions via Wasserstein Projection#175142
• Sort, Partition, Randomize: Optimal Binary Hypothesis Testing under Local Differential Privacy#266105
• Verifiable Random Sampling#410938
• SoK: Computational and Distributed Differential Privacy for MPC#457758