DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska
metadata only
A Review of Contemporary U.S. Wild Horse and Burro Management Policies Relative to Desired Management Outcomes
Legally defined “wild” horse (Equus ferus caballus ) and burro (E. asinus ; WHB) populations in the United States exceed established population objectives. The context of WHB policy and management can be categorized into ecological, geographical, legal, social, and political perspectives. Ecological
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Wild Horse Demography: Implications for Sustainable Management Within Economic Constraints#783810
- Framing Contemporary U.S. Wild Horse and Burro Management Processes in a Dynamic Ecological, Sociological, and Political Environment#783811
- 16 U.S.C. § 460zzz-4 — Management of Conservation Area and Wilderness#570694
- 16 U.S.C. § 539r — Rocky Mountain Front Conservation Management Area and wilderness additions#570556
- 16 U.S.C. § 6909a — United States conservation, management, and enforcement objectives#568123
Record · ID 783812
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive