OpenReview
open access
CC BY
Official Review · ICLR 2025
This paper investigates the theoretical understanding of transformers, which have shown success in various applications but lack a clear theoretical foundation. The study focuses on how transformers can learn a statistical model with group sparsity, where only a subset of input variables (groups) influences the label. The research shows that a one-layer transformer can use attention mechanisms to select relevant variables and ignore irrelevant ones for classification. Additionally, it demonstrates that a well-pretrained one-layer transformer can adapt to new tasks with limited samples and achieve good accuracy. This study provides insights into how transformers learn structured data effectively. 1. This paper investigates the theoretical understanding of transformers, an important and interesting problem that may greatly benefit the deep learning community. 2. This paper is well-written and has a good motivation. 3. The conclusion that a one-layer transformer can use attention mechanisms to select relevant variables and ignore irrelevant ones for classification makes sense to me. 1. Though the problem is interesting, the conclusion, a one-layer transformer can use attention mechanisms to select relevant variables and ignore irrelevant ones for classification, seems to be well-known in the deep learning community and has already been verified by the original paper (Attention Is All You Need). 2. The theoretical understanding of transformers given by this paper mainly focuses on the well-pretrained one-layer transformer. However, it will be much more interesting to study the multi-layer transformer since the scaling law shows that the loss of transformer scales as a power-law with model size, dataset size, and the amount of compute used for training, with some trends spanning more than seven orders of magnitude. 3. The study focuses on how transformers can learn a statistical model with group sparsity, where only a subset of input variables (groups) influences the label. However, the concept of group sparse is not properly defined, making me confused to fully understand it. Further, what is a similar “group-sparse” structure as mentioned in the Introduction section? What kind of “group-sparse” inputs are similar? Please refer to the weaknesses section.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Official Review · ICLR 2026#787175
- Official Review · ICLR 2025#787076
- ClusterAttention: A training-free speedup of bidirectional attention#1141634
- Rethinking Cross-Layer Information Routing in Diffusion Transformers#1143773
- One-Layer Transformer Provably Learns Multiclass One-Nearest Neighbor in Context#627706
Record · ID 787158
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive