Stack Exchange
open access
CC BY-SA
Evidence that matrix multiplication can be done in quadratic time?
It is widely conjectured that $\omega$, the optimal exponent for matrix multiplication, is in fact equal to 2. My question is simple: What reasons do we have for believing that $\omega = 2$? I'm aware of fast algorithms like Coppersmith-Winograd, but I don't know why these might be considered evidence for $\omega = 2$. Naively, it seems to me like a classic example where a community just hopes that a result is true purely for aesthetic reasons. I would love to know if that's essentially the case here.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Vectorization Of Narrow Matrix Multiplication for Ascend AI Inference Acceleration#1110406
- Degree-based weighted adjacency matrices: spectra, integrality, and edge deletion effects#998133
- Linear combination of Schrödingerization for quantum linear systems with optimal matrix-query complexity#1014264
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?#787373
- Quantum Fourier transform toolbox#792566
Record · ID 787544
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive