Stack Exchange
open access
CC BY-SA
How do Marxist economists solve the Diamond-Water Paradox?
For class surveying different economic systems, I read a book on Marxism and its core beliefs. As I read, I came to learn that the Marxist view of economics depends heavily on the Labor Theory of Value since Marx believed that the value of a good was determined by the amount of labor. But, from what I understand, the economic community no longer accepts the Labor Theory of Value due to its inability to explain the Diamond-Water Paradox. How is it then, that certain economists still adhere to the Marxist view of economics? How do they have Marxism explain the Diamond-Water Paradox?
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Historical materialism and the economics of Karl Marx#49729
- Quantitative insights into labor dynamics#347737
- Keynesian economics#18286
- Milton Friedman: Economics in Theory and Practice, by Abraham Hirsch and Neil de Marchi, University of Michigan Press, 1990, VIII+325 pages#754583
- Essays on labor supply and demand#293631
Record · ID 787713
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive