arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Who Flips? Self- and Cross-Model Counterarguments Reveal Answer Instability in LLMs
Standard accuracy benchmarks evaluate whether large language models (LLMs) reach correct answers. However, they do not test whether models maintain that answer when challenged by a plausible counter-argument. We introduce a controlled protocol for evaluating answer stability: after a model answers a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Who Flips? Self- and Cross-Model Counterarguments Reveal Answer Instability in LLMs#793732
- CounterBench: Evaluating and Improving Counterfactual Reasoning in Large Language Models#139128
- Efficient computation of counterfactual explanations of LVQ models#779198
- CounterRoute: Self-Routed Reasoning via Hierarchical Counterfactual Credit Assignment#1077038
- TimeThink: Eliciting Compositional Reasoning in Timeseries Large Language Models#1071243
Record · ID 789728
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive