PhilArchive
open access
Inertia-Production, Propaganda 2.1, and the Political Economy of Slopaganda
This article develops a theoretical bridge between the concept of ‘slopaganda’ and Peter Ayolov’s Propaganda 2.1 and Kayfabe Politics, arguing that generative AI has not merely accelerated misinformation but has industrialised a political economy of communication in which content is produced by inertia rather than intention. Drawing on Michał Klincewicz, Mark Alfano, and Amir Ebrahimi Fard’s analysis of slopaganda, the argument reframes ‘AI slop’ as epistemic pollution within an attention economy whose primary output is not persuasion but managed affect, especially anger and moral injury. In Propaganda 2.1, ‘openly implausible claims’ function less as propositions aimed at belief and more as performative signals that test loyalty, harden group identity, and keep the outrage engine turning. The article proposes that the crucial shift is not from truth to falsehood, but from argument to automaticity: the media system becomes an inertia-production apparatus that can manufacture dissent and consent at once, because generative systems can produce instant textual ‘reality’ for every taste, and can do so at the scale, scope, and speed required by platform monetisation. The conclusion outlines how this fusion of slopaganda and kayfabe politics restructures public reasoning into a continuous loop of exposure, reaction, correction, and recommodification, and it sketches institutional and regulatory implications of treating affective manipulation as a core political-economic variable rather than a side-effect. The conceptual framework developed in this article is closely aligned with and substantially informed by Peter Ayolov’s broader body of work on media power, political communication, and the economic organisation of public discourse. Across his books and articles published between 2023 and 2026, Ayolov advances a consistent thesis: contemporary mass communication operates less as a space of persuasion or deliberation and more as an automated industrial system driven by monetisation imperatives, affective extraction, and structural inertia.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Defectiveness of Propaganda#695181
- Attunement: On the Cognitive Virtues of Attention#735606
- When Belief Stops Updating: A Resolution Theory Account of Ideological Capture#74365
- Truth and universality: a necessary antinomy?#712333
- “Imaginationland,“ Terrorism, and the Difference Between Real and Imaginary#745063
Record · ID 79047
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive