LLM-Based Agents for Software and Systems Security: Approaches, Applications, and Assessment

[2608.28490] LLM-Based Agents for Software and Systems Security: Approaches, Applications, and Assessment Skip to main content Search Submit Donate Log in Computer Science > Cryptography and Security arXiv:2608.28490 (cs) [Submitted on 28 Aug 2026] Title: LLM-Based Agents for Software and Systems Security: Approaches, Applications, and Assessment Authors: Jingjing Nie , Jiawei Guo , Krishna Meda , Haipeng Cai View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract: Software and systems security workflows are typically procedural: analysts inspect heterogeneous artifacts, form hypotheses, invoke tools, interpret outputs, and revise plans. Large language model (LLM)-based agents, which can plan, use tools, retain state, and revise actions across multi-step workflows, are being rapidly adopted to automate this work. Given the consequences of delegating security decisions to autonomous systems, understanding how such agents are built, used, and assessed is crucial. Yet to this date, there remains a lack of systematic understanding of what has been done and how far we are in this field: the term "agent" is applied inconsistently, applications differ sharply in risk, and assessment protocols are often incomparable. To gain a comprehensive and coherent view of this area hence inform relevant future research, this paper provides a systematic literature review of the (1) technical approaches, including agent architecture, perception, memory, reasoning and planning, action space, orchestration, and self-improvement, (2) applications, with respect to the security tasks served, and (3) assessment, including the datasets, outcome and trajectory metrics, safety measures, and baselines considered, over the peer-reviewed literature spanning the emergence of this area (2023--2026). Our synthesis reveals a field that has built agents able to act but not yet agents whose authority is bounded or whose behavior is auditable. In addition to knowledge systematization, we also extend our insights into the limitations of and challenges faced by current approach, application, and assessment designs, which shed light on potentially promising future research directions. Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR) ; Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2608.28490 [cs.CR] (or arXiv:2608.28490v1 [cs.CR] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.28490 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Jiawei Guo [ view email ] [v1] Fri, 28 Aug 2026 16:19:01 UTC (154 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Additional Features Audio Summary Current browse context: cs.CR < prev | next > new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations SciX Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? ) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? ) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? ) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? ) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? ) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? ) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? ) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? ) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? ) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? ) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate ( What is Replicate? ) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? ) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? ) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? ) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? ) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs . Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? ) We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders , member institutions , and all contributors. About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab)

Related documents

• LLM-Based Agents for Software and Systems Security: Approaches, Applications, and Assessment#788492
• ForesightSafety-SAGE:A Fully Automated Scenario Generation and Safety Evaluation Framework for LLM Agents#800068
• Semi-Automated Detection of Gaps in LLM Security Knowledge#1061754
• Maat: Independent Deterministic Contract-Based Governance for Multi-Agent LLM Workflows#1119090
• Maat: Independent Deterministic Contract-Based Governance for Multi-Agent LLM Workflows#1108845