arXiv (All)
open access
CrossAudit: A Git-Native, Cross-Vendor Audit Loop for Agentic Science
An AI scientist should not grade its own homework. Yet in the systems we examined, the agent that reviews the work usually comes from the same model family as the agent that produced it, or at least from the same vendor. Model evaluators are known to favour their own generations. Whether models trai
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- CrossAudit: A Git-Native, Cross-Vendor Audit Loop for Agentic Science#788878
- Evolving Idea Graphs with Learnable Edits-and-Commits for Multi-Agent Scientific Ideation#158574
- Methodological Harness in Agentic Software Engineering: An Empirical Study on Mining Software Repositories#1115970
- Silent Failures in Agent-Tool Interaction: An Audit of ToolUniverse#1063047
- LLMoxie: Exploring Agentic AI for Scientific Software Development#343453
Record · ID 792882
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive