arXiv (All)
open access
The reach of a verification tool decides its value: A controlled study of verification surface, artifact quality, and cost in AI coding agents
Modern artificial-intelligence coding agents can be equipped with tools for checking their own work e.g. a linter, a boot probe, a shell, a screenshot tool. We call this set the agent's verification surface. This study asks whether increasing only that surface, with everything else held fixed, produ
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The reach of a verification tool decides its value: A controlled study of verification surface, artifact quality, and cost in AI coding agents#622630
- The reach of a verification tool decides its value: A controlled study of verification surface, artifact quality, and cost in AI coding agents#789029
- AgentDV: Closed-Loop Agentic AI for Hardware Design Verification#1104467
- SaltBench: A Referee-Gated Protocol for Measuring Method Effects in Machine-Checked Software Work#998636
- GUISpector: An MLLM agent framework for automated verification of natural lananguage requirements in GUI prototypes / Kristian Kolthoff, Felix Kretzer, Simone Paolo Ponzetto, Alexander Maedche, Christian Bartelt#1106512
Record · ID 793033
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive