PhilArchive
open access
BETWEEN REALPOLITIK AND ISLAMIC SOLIDARITY: A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF INDONESIA'S FOREIGN POLICY ON THE GAZA CONFLICT UNDER PRESIDENT PRABOWO SUBIANTO
Indonesia's foreign policy towards the Gaza conflict under President Prabowo Subianto has sparked intense public debate regarding the nation's moral positioning in international relations. While Indonesia consistently voices support for Palestinian independence through diplomatic channels and humanitarian aid, its participation in multilateral "peace" forums initiated by the United States and its allies is perceived by some observers as a pragmatic compromise that potentially undermines principled solidarity. This article critically evaluates these policies through an integrated analytical framework comprising three perspectives: (1) Islamic political ethics, (2) contemporary scholarly ijtihad, and (3) international political analysis. Employing a qualitative method with Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), this study examines official government statements (2023-2024), ulama fatwas from major Indonesian Islamic organizations (MUI, NU, Muhammadiyah), and literature on Islamic political ethics. The findings reveal a fundamental tension between the principle of Muslim solidarity (ukhuwah islamiyah) and the demands of realpolitik in contemporary diplomacy. While Islamic ethics emphasize justice ('adl), public interest (maslahah), and trustworthiness (amanah) as normative parameters, political analysis highlights the structural dilemma between moral idealism and national strategic interests. Specifically, this study identifies three key issues: (1) the ambiguity between rhetorical support and concrete diplomatic action, (2) the divergence between Islamic organizational positions and government policy, and (3) the risk of credibility erosion in Indonesia's soft power as a Muslim-majority mediator. This study concludes that Indonesia's foreign policy requires strategic recalibration to maintain moral credibility without sacrificing diplomatic efficacy, suggesting a need for greater transparency, public accountability, and explicit alignment with ethical principles. The research contributes to the growing discourse on Islamic ethics in international relations and offers a normative evaluation framework for assessing foreign policy in Muslim-majority democracies.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Ritual as Praxis: The Responsibility of Activists in the Face of Genocide; or, Between Ethics and Politics#94941
- Kelsen vs Schmitt on Guardians of the Constitution Debates and the Impact on the Indonesian Legal System#163227
- The Peacekeeping Dilemma: Understanding the Challenges of UN Peacekeeping in Modern Conflicts#68028
- The Uniqueness of Islamic Economic and Financial Practices in Indonesia#936716
- Governance and Regulation of Autonomous Weapons and Cybersecurity (2016–2024): The Influence of States, International Organizations, and Civil Society on International Humanitarian Law#729741
Record · ID 79380
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive