arXiv (All)
open access
Repair or Resample? Rethinking Failure Debugging in LLM Multi-Agent Systems
As large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems (MASs) are increasingly applied to long-horizon complex tasks, their reliability has emerged as the core bottleneck hindering their real-world deployment. Existing MAS debugging and repair methods typically rely on rerunning and resampling the
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Repair or Resample? Rethinking Failure Debugging in LLM Multi-Agent Systems#789906
- Constraint Decay: The Fragility of LLM Agents in Backend Code Generation#1035486
- Official Review · ICLR 2026#787088
- RestoreBench: Can AI Agents Restore Power Flow Convergence?#819833
- RestoreBench: Can AI Agents Restore Power Flow Convergence?#809837
Record · ID 793925
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive