PhilArchive
open access
Authorship Transparency Statement (ATS) Framework: A Technical Standard for the Multi-Tiered Disclosure of Generative AI in Creative Works
The rapid proliferation of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has fundamentally disrupted the traditional concept of singular authorship, creating a critical nomenclature gap in the creative industries. Existing disclosure requirements frequently rely on low-resolution binaries that facilitate a "transparency paradox," wherein creators are incentivized toward obfuscation rather than honest methodology. This paper proposes the Authorship Transparency Statement (ATS) Framework, a multi-tiered technical protocol anchored by the Bright Line of Prose Origin. This mechanical distinction shifts the focus from subjective "creative control" to the objective origin of first-pass drafting. By defining a six-tier hierarchy (ATS-0 through ATS-5), the protocol categorizes the human role across a gradient of increasing AI autonomy: from the Traditional Artisan (ATS-0) and Architect (ATS-1) to the Director (ATS-3) and Systems Architect (ATS-4). Furthermore, the ATS framework provides the foundational schema for institutional implementation, offering standardized intake templates and machine-readable metadata structures designed to interoperate with emerging provenance standards such as C2PA. By replacing primitive binaries with a rigorous, methodology-based audit, the ATS protocol seeks to preserve the integrity of authorship and establish a verifiable "paperwork of becoming" for the new creative age.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond "Made with AI": Visualizing Provenance Density to Mitigate the Transparency Penalty#926379
- Diffusing the Creator: Attributing Credit for Generative AI Outputs#82569
- Beyond the Gatekeeper: A Framework for AI-Assisted Open Peer Review and Decentralized Scientific Evaluation#691781
- Revolutionizing Metadata Management through Intelligent Automation#714906
- The human-authorship halo: attribution bias in literary style evaluation by humans and AI#972394
Record · ID 79607
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive