arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Ontology-Guided Multi-Agent Extraction of Evaluation Objects from Academic Review Texts: Evidence from Chinese Library and Information Science
Academic reviews, scholarly commentaries, and book reviews serve as sources of evaluative statements about theories, methods, literature, institutions, and policies, providing valuable evidence for scholarly evaluation. Existing scientific entity extraction methods mainly target research articles an
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Ontology-Guided Multi-Agent Extraction of Evaluation Objects from Academic Review Texts: Evidence from Chinese Library and Information Science#798171
- PRISMA-LLM: An Empirical Reporting Framework for AI-Assisted Systematic Reviews#673570
- Searching smarter, not harder: leveraging AI to enhance literature searches for theory-driven reviews-A methodological case study.#756
- Beyond the Text: Verifying That Agent-Written Papers Are Backed by Their Artifacts#1036795
- Beyond Outcomes: Dual-View Relational Learning for Efficient Agent Benchmarking#1013066
Record · ID 796758
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive