PhilArchive
open access
A paradox of surprising female underrepresentation in analytic philosophy
In this paper, I raise and respond to the question of why females are underrepresented in parts of philosophy which one might classify as feminine.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Gender, power, and symbolism in Yoruba proverbs: A sociolinguistic perspective from African oral literature#690683
- Underrepresentation and the hostile atmosphere hypothesis: a distinction#101293
- Cisgender Commonsense and Philosophy's Transgender Trouble#719356
- Kierkegaard and the Feminine Self#740799
- The Nonduality of Male and Female Elements#764416
Record · ID 79770
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive