arXiv (All)
open access
Breaking the Code: Security Assessment of AI Code Agents Through Systematic Jailbreaking Attacks
Code-capable large language model (LLM) agents are embedded in software engineering workflows where they can read, write, and execute code, raising "jailbreak" stakes beyond text-only settings. Prior evaluations emphasize refusal or harmful-text detection, leaving open whether agents compile and run
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Breaking the Code: Security Assessment of AI Code Agents Through Systematic Jailbreaking Attacks#797238
- PSD: Pseudo Self-Distillation of Memory Representation Capabilities for LLM Agents#1049190
- Bait-and-Recover: Poisoning Internal Refusal Signals to Defend LLMs against White-Box Editing Jailbreaks#973424
- How Many Iterations to Jailbreak? Dynamic Budget Allocation for Multi-Turn LLM Evaluation#1104437
- Bridging AI and Software Security: A Comparative Vulnerability Assessment of LLM Agent Deployment Paradigms#31475
Record · ID 798652
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive