arXiv (All)
open access
Turbulence Closure in RANS and Flow Inference around a Cylinder using PINNs and Sparse Experimental Data
Traditional Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) closures, based on the Boussinesq eddy viscosity hypothesis and calibrated on canonical flows, often yield inaccurate predictions of both mean flow and turbulence statistics. Here, we consider flow past a circular cylinder over a range of Reynolds n
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Turbulence Closure in RANS and Flow Inference around a Cylinder using PINNs and Sparse Experimental Data#797241
- The Minimal Attached Eddy in Wall Turbulence: Statistical Foundations, Inverse Identification and Influence Kernels#1082900
- Sharp Basic Velocity Estimates for the Plane Steady Navier--Stokes Equations through Vorticity#1105403
- Optimal error estimates for the half-way bounce-back lattice Boltzmann method for the Stokes equations#781204
- Optimal error estimates for the half-way bounce-back lattice Boltzmann method for the Stokes equations#779829
Record · ID 798655
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive