arXiv (All)
open access
Estimating systematic errors in Bayesian inversion using transport maps
In indirect measurements, the sought parameters have to be determined by solving an inverse problem, typically in a Bayesian framework. Often, the accurate numerical simulation of the measuring process is computationally demanding, making it necessary to rely on approximate models. These surrogates,
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Approximating Measures on Function Spaces: Transport and Truncation#1011519
- Separating Intrinsic Ambiguity from Estimation Uncertainty in Deep Generative Models for Linear Inverse Problems#187318
- Uncertainty Quantification of State Variables Trajectories in the Context of Inverse Problems: An Approach from Bayesian Inference and FDA#822337
- General Uncertainty Estimation with Delta Variances#183206
- Uncertainty quantification for inverse problems#280334
Record · ID 799886
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive