arXiv (All)
open access
Do We Still Need Humans in the Loop? Human vs. LLM Annotation in Active Learning for TikTok Hate Speech Detection
Annotating data remains a costly bottleneck for supervised NLP. Active learning (AL) reduces the number of human labels needed by selecting only the most informative instances, while instruction-tuned LLMs attack the same bottleneck from the other side, making labels cheap enough to annotate entire
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Selective Attention System (SAS): Device-Addressed Speech Detection for Real-Time On-Device Voice AI#2648
- Queer inclusion in speech datasets: An audit and taxonomy of practical tensions#1061130
- Deconstructing Stereotypes: Scope-Conditioned Generation for Effective Multilingual Counterspeech#1123318
- BANG BANG: Bias Dialogs#952313
- Calpric: Inclusive and Fine-grain Labeling of Privacy Policies with Crowdsourcing and Active Learning#1037665
Record · ID 800006
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive