arXiv (All)
open access
Mnemosyne: Agentic Transaction Processing for Validating and Repairing AI-generated Workflows
LLMs increasingly generate workflow actions and repairs that may be well formed yet stale, infeasible, conflicting, or destructive of their own evidence. We introduce Agentic Transaction Processing (ATP), which treats generated actions as untrusted proposals until deterministic admission accepts the
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- How to Speculate about Uncertainty in Agentic Coding? A Draft-Model Gate Method#972210
- APIFlow-Bench: Measuring Whether Agents Survive Long, Dependent API Workflows#622623
- AI as a High-Bandwidth Unreliable Source: Why It Is Neither Tool Nor Agent#731142
- How Compliant Are GitHub Actions Workflows? A Checklist-Based Study with LLM-Assisted Auditing#155399
- Silent Failures in Agent-Tool Interaction: An Audit of ToolUniverse#1063047
Record · ID 800093
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive