arXiv (All)
open access
Controlled Evaluation of Graph and Multimodal Augmentation in RAG for Document Question Answering
Graph and multimodal extensions to retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) are often evaluated end to end, making it difficult to isolate whether gains arise from retrieval, prompt-side context, visual access, generator capability, or benchmark construction. We present a stage- and evidence-controlled
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- ViSAR: Training-Free Adaptive-$k$ Retrieval for Visual Document Question Answering#926251
- Beyond Raw Context Transfer: Representation-based Federated Retrieval-Augmented Generation#1036845
- CrossModalQA: A Cross-modal and Multi-hop Benchmark for Multimodal Retrieval-augmented Generation#972579
- ConfRAG: Confidence-Guided Retrieval-Augmenting Generation#927137
- DualG-MRAG: Decoupling Macro-Reasoning and Micro-Matching for Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation#414133
Record · ID 800105
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive