PhilArchive
open access
Divergence Arguments in Collective Epistemology
Many have argued that the lives of groups and their members may diverge. For example, that groups can believe or know propositions that none of their members know or believe. This article gives an overview of a prominent type of argument, called divergence argument, which aims to support this view. In particular, the article will work out a conceptual map that enables us to discuss underlying theoretical assumptions and categorise different types of divergence arguments as well as the potential objections they face.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Collective Epistemic Reasons are Implausible#95623
- Moving Together, Becoming One: The Phenomenology of Group Coherence in The OA#75652
- Epistemic intuitions#755969
- No Guarantee: Coherence, Rationality, and Fragmentation#107800
- Asymptotic Phase and the Epistemic Vector: Beyond Probabilistic Mechanics Toward Coherent Consciousness#118046
Record · ID 80522
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive