ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Male External Catheters' Comparison of Comfort and Efficacy
A Prospective, Randomized, Crossover, Single-blind, Single Center Healthy Volunteer Study conducted over 1 day, with 2 voids using the PureWick (PW) Male external catheter (MEC) vs. comparator Sage PrimoFit™. This study is designed to assess the performance, comfort, and ease of use of the PW Male external catheter as compared to the comparator product.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- An Evaluation of the PureWick™ Male External Catheter Versus an Established Comparator Overnight in the Home Setting for Incontinence in Adult Males#1089068
- Continence Care Registry#1096649
- TURP Inpatient With Underactive Bladder With BOO#899464
- Evaluating the quality, understandability, actionability, and readability of ChatGPT-generated patient information on overactive bladder: A cross-sectional study.#388627
- Hot and Cold Applications on PVC Insertion#1008973
Record · ID 805243
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive