ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Laryngeal Mask Ambu Aura Once vs. Supreme in Children
The purpose of this study is determine safety and efficiency of mechanical ventilation in children with two different types of single use laryngeal masks (Ambu AuraOnce vs. LMA Supreme). The main interest is leakage pressure of oropharynx and stomach. The null hypothesis is that leakage pressures of Ambu AuraOnce and LMA Supreme are equivalent. The alternative hypothesis is that there is a difference in leakage pressure.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Effects on the Awakening With Laryngeal Mask vs Endotracheal Tube in Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Base Surgery#856166
- CraniSeal Post Approval Study#867880
- Budesonide Following Endoscopic Dilatation of Esophageal Strictures in Children.#906838
- Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Dilatation With Eso-Filp in Benign Esophageal Strictures#805686
- Impact of Pulmonary Function on Vestibular System in Children#845971
Record · ID 805280
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive