ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Scotchbond Universal Plus Compared to Scotchbond Universal With Filtek Universal Restorative to Restore Class V NCCLs
This is a prospective, controlled, within-subject, randomized, single-center study comparing Scotchbond Universal Plus (SBU+) and Scotchbond Universal (SBU) adhesives when used with Filtek restorative. The study will enroll Subjects scheduled to undergo Class-V non-carious cervical lesion (NCCL) restorations.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Performance Of Cervical Restorations Using Nitric Acid and Mineral Enriched Adhesive Versus Phosphoric Acid and Universal Adhesive#903702
- 36-Month Clinical Evaluation of a Universal Adhesive#803596
- Clinical Comparison of Different Adhesives in NCCLs#869514
- Efficacy of Two Approaches in Cervical Single-door Laminoplasty for Spinal Canal Enlargement#804602
- Renuvion APR System When Used as an Adjunct Procedure In Gynecomastia Surgery#837985
Record · ID 805480
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive