ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Peripheral Parenteral Nutrition vs Conventional Fluid in Colorectal Resection in ERAS
Assess if administration of early nutrition support with Perioperative Peripheral Nutrition (PeriOliclimonel) N4-E) in patients undergoing colon cancer resection in an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol improve the results of morbi-mortality and hospitalization versus standard intravenous fluid therapy.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Effects of Parenteral ω-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid on Postoperative Complications of Patients With Crohn's Disease#880082
- Evaluating quality of colorectal cancer surgery across elective and emergency health systems: secondary analysis of prospective cohort studies in 95 countries#408874
- Oral Versus Parenteral Nutrition Support to Improve Protein Balance in Colorectal Surgical Patients#910918
- Indirect Calorimetry-Guided Parenteral Nutrition Prescribing in Oncology Patients#917233
- Enteral vs parenteral nutrition after major abdominal surgery - An even match#456876
Record · ID 806726
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive